Legal Opinion
Comstock v. Little
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 21, 1961No. 38776PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
This action was instituted April 24, 1957, by O. T. Little and his wife (plaintiffs) against R. K. Comstock and his wife (defendants) seeking a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from removing a “partition” fence dividing the lands of the respective parties and from coming on the land of plaintiffs and erecting another fence north of the alleged division fence. Reference will be made to the parties as they appeared in the lower court.
Plaintiffs alleged in their petition that in 1907 the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 13 North, Range 4 East of the Indian…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lewis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Howard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Moschos v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. ImlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Goodall v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Wilson v. HarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Francis v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Kimberly v. DeWittCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Leach v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.