Legal Opinion
Goodall v. City of Clinton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 25, 1945No. 32025PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURST, V. C. J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs, Goodall and others, as owners and tenants in possession of three residence properties in the city of Clinton, to enjoin the defendants, the city of Clinton and the three members of its board of health, from carrying out an order of the city board of health, made October 26, 1943, declaring certain frost proof or Vogle type toilets in use on the three properties to constitute a public nuisance and directing that the nuisance be abated. From a judgment denying the injunction, the plaintiffs have appealed.
Plaintiffs’ petition for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Weitz v. MouldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Glasco v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Gragg v. State Ex Rel. SelbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- American Druggists' Fire Ins. Co. of Cincinnati v. State Insurance BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smicklas v. SpitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Oklahoma Journal Publishing Co. v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Hazelrigg Trucking Co. v. DuvallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Tenneco Oil Company v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.