Legal Opinion

Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Hamilton

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1975No. Appeal, No. 5 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

This is an appeal by Ethel Hamilton (Claimant) from an opinion and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the referee’s denial of workmen’s compensation benefits and dismissing her claim petition.

Claimant was employed by the N.V.F. Company (Employer) in April 1969. From December, 1969 until Jan*427uary, 1971 Claimant’s duties consisted of operating a plastic molding machine. The work required repeated overhead striking of a wooden mallet against the machine in order to loosen the finished product by knocking side plates from the top of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Dunlap v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Holland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Verabish v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Brendley v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Edgewater Steel Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Merz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API