Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Hamilton
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
This is an appeal by Ethel Hamilton (Claimant) from an opinion and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the referee’s denial of workmen’s compensation benefits and dismissing her claim petition.
Claimant was employed by the N.V.F. Company (Employer) in April 1969. From December, 1969 until Jan*427uary, 1971 Claimant’s duties consisted of operating a plastic molding machine. The work required repeated overhead striking of a wooden mallet against the machine in order to loosen the finished product by knocking side plates from the top of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Dunlap v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Holland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Verabish v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Brendley v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Edgewater Steel Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Merz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.