Legal Opinion

Holland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1975No. Appeal, No. 793 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

Claimant-appellant was an employee of appellee on June 15, 1970, at which time her job consisted of gluing pieces of toys together, necessitating the squeezing of pieces between her right thumb and the fingers of her right hand and holding them together for a short period of time. This task was repeated eight times a minute for an entire eight-hour shift. On that particular evening, claimant was gluing pieces of a toy kitten which pieces came out of a machine and were still hot when claimant picked them up. She developed a blister on her right thumb and asked for and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Wance v. Gettig Engineering & Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HamiltonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Brendley v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API