Legal Opinion

Merz v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1977No. Appeal, No. 1463 C.D. 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

Claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County affirming the denial of workmen’s compensation benefits by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board). We affirm.

Claimant was employed by the Department of Labor and Industry, serving from 1939 to 1964 as a sec*640ret-ary to a referee ixr the First District. Her principal duties were supervising the office, scheduling hearings and typing notices. In 1964 it was arranged that claimant could work at home. The change altered her duties, requiring an extensive amount of typing each…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HamiltonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API