Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. HJ Heinz Company

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1972No. Appeal, 1053 C.D. 1971PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Kramer,

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, dismissing the appeal of Darious E. Hinkle (Hinkle) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board (Board) affirming its Beferee’s order of disallowance.

For a period of approximately twenty years prior to the date of the filing of a claim in this case, Hinkle was employed by the H. J. Heinz Company (Heinz) as a bodymaker mechanic, engaged in the work of mailing the body of tin cans. The record clearly shows that the noise in the large room (approximately 500 feet long by 200 feet wide,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Hamilton v. Procon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Mauchline v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Parks v. Miller Printing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Allen v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Haney v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. Auto Express, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Jeddo Highland Coal Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. City of Philadelphia v. HaysCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Dunlap v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API