Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. HJ Heinz Company

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1975PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*114OPINION OF THE COURT

EAGEN, Justice.

This is a case of first impression within this Commonwealth. In it, we are asked to determine whether workmen’s compensation benefits may be awarded for a partial loss of hearing suffered by an employee by reason of protracted exposure to noise in the usual course of employment.

On September 11, 1969, the claimant, Darious E. Hinkle, filed a petition for compensation with the Workmen’s Compensation Board, alleging a 62% loss of hearing in his left ear and a 32 % loss of hearing in his right ear. He assigned May 9, 1969, as the date of the accident and excess…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Hamilton v. Procon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Turner v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API