Legal Opinion

Gepner v. Fujicolor Processing, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2001No. 20010022PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Lynetta Gepner and Donald Kroll appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding Gepner damages for a work-related injury, finding Fujicolor Processing, Inc. (“Fujicolor”) had not wrongfully terminated Gepner’s employment, and refusing to award damages to Kroll for loss of consortium. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Gepner worked as a film delivery driver for Fujicolor. Gepner picked up film at retail stores in North Dakota and Minnesota and delivered it to a relay driver, who transported the film to Fujicolor’s processing plant in South Dakota. The processed film was then…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Kopp v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Suburban Sales & Service, Inc. v. District Court of Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Nesvig v. NesvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Piatz v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. $33,000.00 United States CurrencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Gratech Co., Ltd. v. WOLD ENGINEERINGNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Howe v. Microsoft Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API