Legal Opinion
Auer v. City of Minot
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided April 11, 2016No. Case No. 4:15-cv-00040-DLH-CSMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge, United States District Court
Plaintiff is suing defendant over her termination from employment as Minot City Attorney. According to the First Amended Complaint, plaintiff began her' employment as City Attorney on March 31, 2014, and was terminated on May 2, 2014.
Before the court now is defendant’s First Motion to Compel Discovery. The motion contains two requests for relief. The first is that plaintiff be required to execute authorizations that would allow defendant…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Deborah L. Schoffstall v. William Henderson, Agent U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hardy v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Martin v. SommerdorfDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2019
- NDN Collective v. Retsel CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024
- Valdez v. LowryDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021