Legal Opinion

Coffey v. Greer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1958No. 309PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNny, J.

The appellants in the trial below excepted to the rulings of the court in excluding certain proffered evidence, which evidence is set out in the record. Assignments of error Nos. 1 and 2 based on these exceptions are not brought forward or discussed in the appellants’ brief. Hence, they will be deemed as abandoned. Rule 28 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 562.

As a matter of fact, the appellants do not bring forward in their brief a single assignment of error or exception on which their assignments of error are based. They do, however, discuss generally and insist that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Euliss v. . McAdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Den Ex Dem. Sasser v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1832
  4. Den. on Dem. of Corn v. McCrarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1856
  5. Greer v. . HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. RESORT DEVELOPMENT CO. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Harris v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. In Re the Last Will & Testament of HarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. RESORT DEVELOPMENT CO. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API