Legal Opinion

Coffey v. Greer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 30, 1955No. 309PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

It is stated in the description in the plaintiffs’ deed to the 12-aere tract of land that it begins “on a stake in new Highway No. 321, just below old house and corner to the R. T. Greer tract (being the 16-acre tract now owned by the defendants) and runs with line of said R. T. Greer tract North 75 West 18 poles to a stake in old Highway 321 just below rock house”; etc.

It appears from undisputed evidence in the trial below that the field notes made by the surveyor when the lands of T. F. Greer were divided among his heirs by the execution of partition deeds, and from which notes the deeds…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Cover.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Euliss v. . McAdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Den Ex Dem. Sasser v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1832
  4. Den. on Dem. of Corn v. McCrarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1856
  5. Bowen v. . GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Batson v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Carney v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Harris v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API