Legal Opinion
United States v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 11, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
The Government brings these five .actions to recover $3,500 on the defendant’s bonds. The bonds were conditioned to insure the departure of the aliens named in the respective bonds upon the aliens’ failure to maintain their status (as students or as visitors for pleasure) under which status they were temporarily admitted to the United States, and also to insure their departure, in any event, on or before a fixed date.
Plaintiff has moved and defendant has cross-moved for summary judgment in each of the five cases. Certain facts in each of the said cases have been…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- James Alvado v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Syracuse Broadcasting Corporation v. Samuel I. Newhouse, the Herald Company, the Post-Standard Company and Central New York Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1965
- Goldinger v. Boron Oil CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Dworman v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, Etc., MorristownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- County of Erie v. American States InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Waldron v. British Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.