Legal Opinion
Waldron v. British Petroleum Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 1965PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge:
The court has before it two motions. The first is the renewal of a motion by defendant Cities Service Co. — initially made in 1960 — for summary judgment under Rule 56(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that plaintiff has failed, in his affidavits, to “set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.”
The second motion is by plaintiff1 for further discovery, pursuant to Rule 56 (f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The relevant facts were detailed and analyzed by this court at an earlier stage of this litigation.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Vermont Structural Slate Company, Inc. v. Tatko Brothers Slate Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Waldron v. British Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Seago v. North Carolina Theatres, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
- Patricia Waldron, as of the Last Will and Testament of Gerald B. Waldron, Deceased v. Cities Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Johns Hopkins University v. HuttonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- Istituto Per Lo Sviluppo Economico Dell' Italia Meridionale v. Sperti Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Upper W. Fork River Watershed Assoc. v. Corps of Engrs., United States ArmyDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.