Legal Opinion

Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 5, 1947No. 26, Docket 20664PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. The first cause of action, i. e., breach of contract:

We agree with the trial judge that the provision of the contract that there were “no oral or other agreements or understandings,” precluded consideration of any evidence as to any extrinsic agreement. But it did not bar reception of evidence dehors the written agreement, to show what the parties meant by the following words of that agreement: “Grant of Selling Privilege and Territory: (1) Seller hereby grants to Dealer the franchise to sell new Chevrolet motor vehicles, chassis, parts and accessories in the following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Avrick v. Rockmont Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. Bozant v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Madeirense Do Brasil S/A v. Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Boro Hall Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API