Legal Opinion
Goldinger v. Boron Oil Company
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 6, 1974No. Civ. A. 72-765PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEBER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, whose contract with defendant to operate a retail gasoline service station was terminated effective January 24, 1972, has filed this complaint on causes of action which are all based on plaintiff’s agreement with defendant to operate the retail gasoline station. Count I of the complaint alleges that such agreement was in violation of the antitrust laws of the United States, constituting a conspiracy to fix prices in violation of Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act, [15 U.S.C.A. § 1], or a tying arrangement in violation of Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act, or Sec. 3 of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Pontius v. Children's HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Robinson v. MagovernDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Paul Revere Protective Life Insurance v. WeisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.