Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Daskalopoulos

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 13, 2004No. Misc. Docket AG No. 33 Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Argued Before BELL, Chief Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 approved the filing by Bar Counsel of a Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Dimitri G. Daskalopoulos, the respondent. In that petition, pursuant to two complaints filed against him, Bar Counsel charged the respondent with misconduct, as defined by Maryland Rules 16 — 701(i), 2 and 16-812, and consisting of violations of various of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, as adopted by the latter Maryland Rule, to wit:. Rules 1.4,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SperyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GisrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShoupCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PrichardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrisbonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API