Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Brisbon

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 17, 2005No. Misc. Docket AG No. 60, September Term, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (the “Commission”), through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 filed against Brenda C. Brisbon, the respondent, a Petition for Disciplinary Action, in which it was alleged that she violated Rules 1.3 (Diligence); 2 1.4 (Communication); 3 8.1 (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters) 4 and 8.4 (Misconduct), 5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Ap pendix: Rules of Professional Conduct of the Maryland Rules, see Maryland Rule 16-812. We referred the matter, pursuant to Rule 16-752(a), 6 to the Honorable Bonita J. Dancy of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrisbonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KimmelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaignanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. RobatonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API