Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shoup

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 28, 2009No. Misc. Docket AG No. 43 September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“the petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a)1 filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Jonathan H. Shoup, (“the respondent”). Bar Counsel alleged that the respondent violated the following Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”)2: 1.1 (Competence),3 1.4(a) and (b) (Communicat*469ion),4 1.7(b) (Conflict of Interest: General Rule),5 1.8(a) (Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions),6 1.15(a), (b) and (c) *470(Safekeeping Property),7 and 8.4(a), (c) and (d)…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZhangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. StillwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API