Legal Opinion
Shuldener v. Trio Water Engineering Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 20, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
This is a suit for infringement of the Shuldener patent, No. 1,796,407, issued March 17, 1931, covering apparatus for the treatment of liquid. The. application as originally filed contained both method and apparatus claims, but the method claims were withdrawn during the Patent Office proceedings, leaving only the apparatus claims in the patent when it issued.
The plaintiff Shuldener is the owner of the patent, and the plaintiff Water Service Laboratories, Inc., holds an exclusive license for limited territory. The defendant Trio Water Engineering Corporation is engaged in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. American Neon Light CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Star Can Opener Co. v. Owen Dyneto Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Ruggles-Coles Engineering Co. v. McGann Engineering Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ibis Enterprises, Limited v. Spray-Bilt, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1963
- American Technical MacHinery Corp. v. Masterpiece Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Arthur Rosengren v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020