Legal Opinion
Ibis Enterprises, Limited v. Spray-Bilt, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 24, 1963No. Civ. 10648-MPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McRAE, District Judge.
In accordance with the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered herein, it is
Ordered, adjudged and decreed that:
1. The said Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are hereby adopted and made a part of this Final Judgment.
2. Each of the Defendants is hereby enjoined from any further infringement of claims One (1) through Six (6) of patent No. 2,933,125 and claim Eleven (11) of patent No. 2,787,314.
3. The Plaintiffs recover from the Defendants damages to be determined after an accounting in a sum adequate to compensate the Plaintiffs for the infringement and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Columbia Broadcasting System v. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Spray-Bilt, Inc. And David H. Richman v. Ingersoll-Rand World Trade, Limited, and Rand Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Canadian Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Peterson Products of San Mateo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Canadian Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Peterson Products of San Mateo, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1963
- Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.