Legal Opinion

American Technical MacHinery Corp. v. Masterpiece Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1964No. Civ. 7798PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEALON, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff, American Technical Machinery Corporation, seeks injunctive relief and damages from Masterpiece Enterprises, Inc., and Norris Machine Company, Inc., and also against Percy Dieffenbach, President of Masterpiece, individually, and Alfred Norris, President of Norris, individually. It is plaintiff’s contention that the defendants have infringed with plaintiff’s patent. The defendant, Percy Dieffenbach, has moved under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss the action, asserting that the complaint fails to state a claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
  3. Upjohn Company v. Italian Drugs Importing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Local 149, Boot and Shoe Workers Union v. Faith Shoe Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Shuldener v. Trio Water Engineering Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  3. Herman Cantor Corp. v. Central Fidelity Bank, N.A. (In Re Herman Cantor Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
  4. A. Stucki Co. v. SchwamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Holiday v. Belle's RestaurantDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API