Legal Opinion

Ruggles-Coles Engineering Co. v. McGann Engineering Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 1929No. 403PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

Tbe bill of complaint charges tbe defendants with tbe infringement of letters patent No. 1,229,978, issued to William J. Kuntz on June 12,1917, for an improvement in drier beads, and assigned by him on June 22, 1920, to the Ruggles-Coles Engineering Company, plaintiff, and prays for an injunction and an accounting.

In their answer tbe defendants deny tbe plaintiff’s title to tbe patent in question and deny infringement. On tbe pleadings and evidence, three questions arise for disposition:

Eirst, tbe title to tbe patent in suit; secondly, infringement; and, thirdly, if…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dangler v. Imperial MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Denominational Envelope Co. v. Duplex Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. Shuldener v. Trio Water Engineering Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  3. McGann Mfg. Co. v. Ruggles-Coles Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API