Legal Opinion

Star Can Opener Co. v. Owen Dyneto Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 24, 1926No. 211PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, Circuit Judge.

This can opener is a means of getting at the contents of the usual tin can, commonly containing articles of food, and commonly eylindrically formed of a sheet of tinned metal soldered at the- line of juncture and terminating at top and bottom in a “flange,” viz. the meeting of the bottom or top and the cylindrical wall of the can. The opener is a manually operated tool, which grasps the flange of the can and provides means, while the can is thus firmly held, to apply the cutting edge of a circular disc, also manually actuated just below the flange and sever the side…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  2. Black & Decker Mfg. Co. v. Baltimore Truck Tire Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  3. Simplex Appliance Co. v. Star Can Opener Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  4. Shuldener v. Trio Water Engineering Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  5. Star Can Opener Co. v. Ace Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API