Legal Opinion

GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. v. Rice

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 20, 1986No. 0610PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

This is an action to vacate a default judgment. Appellant Graybar Electric Company, Inc. sued respondent Lilly Rice and her husband, Tony Rice, individually and doing business as Congaree Electric Company to collect a debt for merchandise allegedly charged by the Rices. Graybar was granted a default judgment against the Rices and Lilly moved to vacate the judgment against her. The trial court granted the motion and Graybar appeals. We affirm.

The propriety of the service of process, under S. C. Code Ann. § 15-9-520 (1976), is not at issue in this action. It was conceded at oral…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaskins v. California Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. Marr v. TesauroCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Varat v. BryantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. A & I, INC. v. GoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Romeo v. LooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Romeo v. LooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API