Legal Opinion · Dissent

Romeo v. Looks

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1987No. 00811Published

1DissentWieand, Judge

The majority, in this case of court-ordered, substituted service, refuses to accept the defendant’s lack of knowledge of the lawsuit against her as adequate excuse for failing to respond thereto and, accordingly, refuses to open a default judgment to allow the presentation of a valid defense. Because this is contrary to the equitable principles which are applicable to petitions to open default judgments, I dissent.

On April 26, 1980, an automobile owned by Theresa Looks and operated by Sherry Rose allegedly collided with another vehicle in which Joseph Romeo was riding as a passenger. An…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Schultz v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API