Marr v. Tesauro
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
This is an appeal of an order denying appellant Tesauro’s motion to file an answer or otherwise plead to Marr’s complaint. We affirm.
The facts are basically undisputed. Tesauro is a resident of Pennsylvania and a director of Respro Corporation. Marr’s complaint alleges that Tesauro and another director of Res-pro conspired to induce him to invest $10,000 in the corporation by falsely representing to him that Respro held exclusive national distributorship rights and that they had invested large sums of their monies into the corporation. The complaint further alleges that these…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Renney v. Dobbs House, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Ledford v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Stewart Ex Rel. Estate of Stewart v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Rochester v. Holiday Magic, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Bishop v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ammons v. HoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986