Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Collins

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 3, 2005No. 4028PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, J.:

Fred Collins, Jr., appeals from a jury award in favor of Marshall Armstrong on causes of action for fraud, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act. Collins argues the trial court erred in: (1) failing to direct a verdict as to all causes of action; (2) allowing Armstrong to amend his complaint to include the two breach of contract claims; and (3) failing to grant Collins a continuance based on the late amendment. We affirm.

FACTS

Collins is the sole owner of Collins…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Williams ex rel. Estate of Williams v. Preiss-Wal Pat III, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
  2. Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Fisher v. PelstringDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
  4. Hawkeye Commodity Promotions, Inc. v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Hawkeye Commodity Promotions, Inc. v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API