A & I, INC. v. Gore

Bobby Gore appeals the circuit court’s decision to affirm the magistrate court verdict in favor of A & I. He argues a new trial should have been granted because the magistrate’s return violated statutory mandates, the return was prepared ex parte, and the tapes of the original proceeding were lost. He also argues the circuit court erred in failing to grant a continuance. We affirm.

FACTS

Gore owned three apartments at the Sun Deck Horizontal Property Regime. The master deed provided that apartment owners were responsible for any problems with interior walls and for maintenance and repairs on…