Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Public National Bank of New York

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1928No. 16 OriginalPublishedCited by 155 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

The petitioner, a national banking association organized under the National Bank Act, with its principal office in the City of New York, brought suit in the federal district court for the southern district of New York against Andrew B. Keating, receiver, and William Reid, Jr., collector of taxes of the City of New York, to enjoin thenxfrom collecting taxes assessed against shares in the association in pursuance of a state law but by, and for the sole use of, the city. The prayer for relief rested upon the contention that the provisions of the state law, which fixed the rate of tax,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Ex Parte CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. PopkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Erlenbaugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API