Legal Opinion
Seravalli v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 8, 1989No. 639-84-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
The Seravalli brothers, Joseph and John, Jr., as sole stockholders of the Brookchester Corporation, have applied under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), for attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred in their successful contract action against the United States. For reasons set forth below, it is concluded that plaintiffs are not entitled to an EAJA award for their efforts in this litigation.
*426I
The underlying action for which plaintiffs now seek EAJA monies was a contract suit in which plaintiffs successfully challenged defendant’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Billy H. Ashburn and Faye F. Ashburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barrera v. PrincipiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Barrera v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
- Barrera v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000