Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barrera v. West

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided February 25, 2000No. 90-1496Published

1DissentSteinberg, Judge

This matter is before the Court on the appellant’s application for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA). I voted to grant the appellant’s motion for a full Court decision in this case because the issues involved are of significant importance, part of the panel opinion is inconsistent with current caselaw, and the resulting partial denial of attorney fees and expenses was in error.

I. Summary

The position that I take in this dissent is summarized below:

This Court has jurisdiction to consider EAJA fees and expenses incurred as to…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API