Legal Opinion

Billy H. Ashburn and Faye F. Ashburn v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 28, 1984No. 83-7467PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal by the defendant United States from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama awarding plaintiffs Billy H. Ashburn and' Faye F. Ashburn $23,330.17 in attorneys’ fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). We hold that the plaintiffs are not entitled to attorneys’ fees and other expenses. Therefore, we reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

In April, 1975, Billy H. Ashburn (“Billy”) and James C. Ashburn (“James”), who are brothers, owned approximately 30% and 70% respectively of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  5. Rawlings v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Marie Lucie Jean v. Alan C. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Sher v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  4. Sokol v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  5. Robert Randall Baker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API