Legal Opinion

Voelkl v. Latin, Admr.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1938PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeiger, J.

This action arose out of a very distressing automobile accident occurring northeast of Green-ville, on February 16, 1935.

Plaintiff, Eleanor Voelkl, and her husband, Frank M. Voelkl, were riding with Harry Horst and Ruth Horst, husband and wife, and a Mrs. Young. Mrs. Horst and Mrs. Voelkl were sisters; Mrs. Horst was driving when the automobile ran off the road into a wire fence and collided with a tree. Mrs. Horst and her husband were killed, and Mr. and Mrs. Voelkl and Mrs. Young were seriously injured.

Harry G. Latin, the administrator of Ruth Horst, is the father of Ruth Horst and of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Bloom v. Leech, Admr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. BaillieOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Chaplowe v. PowsnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. StitzleIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re Estate of WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Miller v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Fountain v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Fuller v. ThrunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API