Bloom v. Leech, Admr.

The journal entry from the Court of Appeals recites that the judgment of the court of common pleas was reversed “for the reason that the trial judge should have submitted the question of whether the parties at the time of the injury complained of by the plaintiff below were engaged in a joint enterprise, under appropriate instructions, and that the withdrawal of this question from consideration by the jury was prejudicial error. ’ ’ So that the sole question for consideration by this court is whether or not the common pleas judge erred in refusing to submit to the jury the question of joint…