Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Stitzle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1942No. 27,613PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRlCHMAN, J.

Appellee’s demurrers for want of facts were sustained to each of the two paragraphs of appellant’s complaint. Declining to plead further appellant suffered judgment that it take nothing and appealed assigning separately as errors the rulings on the demurrers. The paragraphs are alike except as hereinafter indicated. We have condensed most of the allegations but quote where necessary.

Appellant carried compensation insurance on S. P. Brown & Co. which operated a household furnishing department in the Herz store in Terre Haute. Max Wallrich was the manager of the department and Merle Smedley an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scholz v. LeuerWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Clendenning v. SimermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Riggins v. TylerTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Voelkl v. Latin, Admr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. American Mutual Liability Ins. v. Otis Elevator Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Hasbrook v. WingateOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Wagnon v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Lee Brothers v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Allison v. ELYIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API