Legal Opinion
State v. MacDonald
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 1908No. Nos. 15,772-(243)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Case certified from the district court for Scott county, Morrison, J., submitting questions raised by a demurrer to the indictment. They are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
Defendant demurred to an indictment. The trial court, being satisfied that the questions -thus raised were so important and doubtful *252as to require the decision of the supreme court as to the sufficiency of the indictment, certified the following questions:
“1. Does the indictment substantially conform to the requirements of sections 5297, 5298, 6299, and 5300, of the revised laws of 1905, as qualified by section 5305 of such laws?
“2. Do the facts stated in said indictment constitute a public offense ?
“3. Does the indictment contain a statement of the acts constituting the offense in ordinary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Groff v. RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- State v. ClementsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. OmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State v. CantrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- State v. LesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State v. BentonDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1936
- State v. Washed Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.