Legal Opinion

State v. Oman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1963No. 38,716PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for selling and possessing obscene or indecent literature in violation of Minn. St. 1957, § 617.24.

The determinative issue which we consider is whether the information states a public offense.

The offense is charged in the following language:

“* * * that on the 26th day of April in the year A. D. 1960, at said County Arvid Oman then and there being did unlawfully sell and have in his possession, with intent to sell, certain obscene or indecent magazines, pamphlets or story papers containing pictures and photographs, in violation of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. GrimesNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. PetroneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API