Legal Opinion

State v. Cantrell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1945No. 33,959PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

By indictment, defendant was charged with the crime of manslaughter in the second degree. His motion for an order requiring the state to furnish a bill of particulars and specifications of the particular acts relied upon to sustain the charge was deemed necessary properly to prepare his defense, since, as he stated in his motion, “the offense set forth in the indictment is of a general nature and the charge set forth -therein is in general terms.” The motion was granted, and by the court’s order the state was required to furnish defendant or his attorney with — ■

“a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pallis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. State v. Sobelman.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Gibson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. State Ex Rel. Weich v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. State v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ForsmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Asbury Park Press, Inc. v. WoolleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Magraw v. DonovanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
  5. State v. GavleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API