Legal Opinion

Eatley v. Mayer

Hudson County Circuit Court, N.J.

Decided March 11, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, C. C. J.

The defendant moves to strike from the amended complaint a claim for punitive damages on the-ground that sufficient facts are not shown in the complaint or bill of particulars furnished to warrant a recovery of punitive damages.

The complaint alleges the defendant as a dentist who performed dental work for plaintiff and that “such work so-done * * * was negligently, unskillfully, carelessly and with a wanton disregard for plaintiff’s health and physical condition * * * performed.” The complaint also contains charges of particular acts of commission and omission to support the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Staub v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  2. Haines v. SchultzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
  3. Hintz v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  4. Dreimuller v. RogowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  5. Rose v. SquiresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GoozeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. La Bruno v. LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Tabor v. O'GRADYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. LoRocco v. N. J. Manufacturers Indemnity InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. Frega v. NORTHERN NEW JERSEY MTG. ASS'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API