Eatley v. Mayer
Hudson County Circuit Court, N.J.
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, C. C. J.
The defendant moves to strike from the amended complaint a claim for punitive damages on the-ground that sufficient facts are not shown in the complaint or bill of particulars furnished to warrant a recovery of punitive damages.
The complaint alleges the defendant as a dentist who performed dental work for plaintiff and that “such work so-done * * * was negligently, unskillfully, carelessly and with a wanton disregard for plaintiff’s health and physical condition * * * performed.” The complaint also contains charges of particular acts of commission and omission to support the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Staub v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Haines v. SchultzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
- Hintz v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Dreimuller v. RogowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Rose v. SquiresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GoozeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- La Bruno v. LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Tabor v. O'GRADYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- LoRocco v. N. J. Manufacturers Indemnity InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Frega v. NORTHERN NEW JERSEY MTG. ASS'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.