Legal Opinion
La Bruno v. Lawrence
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 27, 1960PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
64 N.J. Super. 570 (1960)
166 A.2d 822
VICTOR LA BRUNO AND GERTRUDE LA BRUNO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
ALONZO W. LAWRENCE, TRADING AS MARSH & LAWRENCE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 12, 1960.
Decided December 27, 1960.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.
Mr. Roger H. McGlynn argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. McGlynn, Stein & McGlynn, attorneys).
Mr. Warren Brody argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Winetsky and Brody, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by KILKENNY, J.A.D.
In this action for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Dreimuller v. RogowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Eatley v. MayerHudson County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1931
- Trainer v. WolffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
- Dalon Contracting Co., Inc. v. ArtmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sandler v. Lawn-A-Mat Chem. & Equip. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Di Giovanni v. PesselSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Enright v. LubowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Winkler v. Hartford Acc. and Ind. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Endress v. Brookdale Community CollegeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.