Legal Opinion

Haines v. Schultz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1888PublishedCited by 29 opinions

In error to Passaic Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

The defendant below, who is the proprietor of the Morning Gall, was sued in libel for uttering the following language of and concerning the plaintiff:

“HOUSE ROBBED.
“a young lady boarder supposed to know something ABOUT IT.
“ Last night, while Mr. and Mrs. Richard Krowley were at Little Coney Island, their house, No. 8 Hamburgh avenue, was entered by some one who got away with a considerable amount of clothing. Mr. Krowley is of the opinion that a young lady boarder named Mamie Schultz knows something about the theft. The girl has been a…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API