Legal Opinion
State v. Gooze
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 21, 1951PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
14 N.J. Super. 277 (1951)
81 A.2d 811
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
SAMUEL GOOZE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 4, 1951.
Decided June 21, 1951.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and FREUND.
Mr. Paul T. Huckin argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Francis V.D. Lloyd, attorney).
Mr. Albert S. Gross argued the cause for the defendant-appellant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.
The question raised by this appeal is whether a person knowingly suffering from a disease, the manifestations of which may recur…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PentzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Lewis v. AmorousCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Staub v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Tift v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Anderson v. HaasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- State v. TippettsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Hugh SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Espeland v. GreenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.