Legal Opinion
Dreimuller v. Rogow
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 17, 1919PublishedCited by 16 opinions
On defendant's rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, Chief Justice.
This was an action of replevin brought to recover certain personal property of which the plaintiff claimed to be the owner, and which was in the possession of the defendant. The writ having been served the defendant gave bond and retained possession of the property. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for the sum of $2,500.
The first contention on the part of the defendant is that the finding of the jury that the plaintiff was the owner of the chattels involved in, the litigation is against the weight of the…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- McAdam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Intermilo, Inc. v. I.P. Enterprises, Inc. v. Milosun Milouot, an Israeli Corporation Intermili, Inc. Israel Frumer, Third-Party Israel FrumerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Maiorino v. Schering-Plough Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- BELL ATLANTIC NETWORK SERVICES v. PM Video Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.