Legal Opinion
Deese v. City of Lodi
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 2, 1937No. Civ. 5829PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
—The plaintiffs began this action seeking an injunction restraining the defendants from enforcing a certain ordinance of the City of Lodi known as Ordinance No. 220, entitled, ‘1 An Ordinance Safeguarding the public health of the Inhabitants of the City of Lodi by regulating the hours of certain business within said City.”
The plaintiffs are engaged in the business of conducting a grocery store within the premises of a certain building known as and called the Lodi Public Market; that in the conduct of their business and for the convenience of their patrons, it is alleged to be necessary for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re SumidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Olds v. KlotzOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Ganley v. ClaeysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re BoehmeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Broadbent v. GibsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Justesen's Food Stores, Inc. v. City of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Justesen's Food Stores, Inc. v. City of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. WatsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.