Tolford v. Church
Michigan Supreme Court
Case made from Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant assigns error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSheRwood, J.
The insurance company in this case was organized and commenced doing business in 1880, under Act 82 of the Session Laws of 1873 (How. Stat. o. 132), and amendments thereto.
On the fifth day of January, 1884, the company, by its officers, made an assessment against the policy-holders to meet its liabilities, then amounting to $18,024.87. The defendant’s assessment was $10. This he paid March 14, 1884, to-an agent of the company haying authority to collect assessments, and to whom he surrendered his policy, and which was subsequently marked “Canceled March 19, 1884,” by the company’s secretary.…
2Cited by5 opinions
- People v. StickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Wardle v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. OttoMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Peake v. YuleMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Bacon v. ClyneMichigan Supreme Court · 1888