Legal Opinion

Wardle v. Townsend

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1889PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Ionia. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit by the receiver of a mutual fire insurance company to recover an assessment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Clarence B. Wardle was appointed receiver of the Home Mutual Eire Insurance Company, of Ionia, Clinton, and Montcalm counties, a corporation organized under Act No. 82, Laws of 1873.

The defendant took insurance in this company, and received five policies, of the following dates: April 18, 1879; September 8, 1879; March 25, 1882; another one of the same date; and one August 25, 1882.

The company had suffered losses which it neglected to pay; and on the nineteenth of February, 1884, the Commissioner of Insurance, acting under the authority conferred by section 15 of said act, made an examination…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Crane v. AmosMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Russell v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bangs v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. Tolford v. ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Bacon v. ClyneMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Taggart v. Wachter, Hoskins & Russel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. Attorney General Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. Lapeer Farmers Mutual Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Sparks v. State Bank & Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Kamm & Schellinger Brewing Co. v. St. Joseph County Village Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API