Legal Opinion
Peake v. Yule
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Assumpsit by J. Warren Peake, receiver of the Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers’ Mutual Fire-Insurance Company, against E. N. Yule, to recover an assessment on a policy. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action was commenced February 25, 1898, to recover an assessment made by plaintiff as re*676ceiver of the Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers’ Mutual Fire Insurance Company. The bill of particulars is as follows:
“To amount due on assessment on policy No. 5,065 for all losses and expenses of the company sustained between the 1st day of January, 1890, and June 16, 1893_______________J....................§41 99
“ Contra.
“ By cash paid on assessment of 1891________ §11 40
“By cash paid on assessment of 1893.... 9 50
“ By cash paid on assessment of 1898________ 8 80
“Total, together with interest thereon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wardle v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Taylor v. DeveauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Russell v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. OttoMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Peake v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Mutual Security Co. v. Sidney Blumenthal & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Cavanagh v. ConnonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900