Bacon v. Clyne
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Sanilao. (Beach, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The only question in this case is one of costs. The plaintiff sued the defendant, who resides in Tuscola county, in the circuit court for the county of Sanilac, and recovered a judgment for the sum of $65.28. This judgment being less than $100, the circuit judge ordered judgment in favor of the defendant for costs. The plaintiff brings error.
Bacon, upon the application of the State Commissioner of Insurance, was, on April 17, 1883, duly appointed, by the circuit court for the county of Sanilac, receiver of the Mercantile Eire Insurance Company of Sanilac, Huron, and Tuscola counties, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Russell v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Tolford v. ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wardle v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Nichol v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906