Sherwood v. Wallin
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Action for the specific performance of a contract in which plaintiffs secured a judgment, and defendant appeals from the judgment on the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.
Appellant demurred to the complaint, and now urges that “The demurrer should have been sustained on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant, in that it does not state facts showing that the plaintiffs have not a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law.”
In support of this contention appellant cites us many authorities to the effect that specific…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cushman v. Thayer Manufacturing Jewelry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Duff v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Sayward v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Senter v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilfallan v. GilfallanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Nason v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Rimes v. RimesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- State Ex Rel. La Prade v. GranthamArizona Supreme Court · 1926