Nason v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county for specific performance of a written contract. The facts are stated in- the opinion. The case was tried before Michael, J., who made findings and directed judgment in favor of plaintiff. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Action in equity to enforce specific performance of a written execu-tory contract between the plaintiff and defendant R. D. Barrett, for the sale of 400 shares of common stock of the Nokomis Coal Company. The trial court made findings and ordered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the specific performance of the contract. Judgment was entered from which the defendant Barrett appealed.
The Nokomis Company was incorporated in August, 1913, with an authorized capital of $600,000 divided into 5,000 shares of $100 each. It issued 3,000 shares of its stock in payment for 3,000 acres of coal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Deitz v. StephensonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- First National Bank v. Corporation Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Sherman v. HerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Model Clothing House v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Comings v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Stephenson (In Re MJK Clearing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Francis v. MedillCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Falk v. the Dirigold CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.